In this blog, and several subsequent blogs, I will share some of what I have learned from research as well as my own field experience about the barriers that stand in the way of realizing the full potential for accelerating projects—barriers that are typically masked by suboptimal solutions that fail to take into account the larger system of which the project is a part. I will begin with the Discipline Block.
Anyone who has passed through the hallowed halls of academia is familiar with the “knowledge silos” that define the boundaries of colleges, schools, departments, and degree programs. Yet in the real world, we know that boundaries defined by academic disciplines are artificial—artifacts of an age when knowledge was easier to codify and categorize, yet continue to be propped up by institutions where courses, semesters and degree plans are designed to serve an academic end-game. Nevertheless, the academic process is so effective in shaping our thinking and the tools that we become adept at using, its talons can be difficult to break free of. This describes the challenge we face when the academic discipline we were immersed in during our “school years” becomes an impediment to seeing opportunities for accelerating projects that do not fit neatly within our discipline comfort zone. Or as Mark Twain put it, “When the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see all problems as nails.”
In his thought-provoking book, “Filters Against Folly,” Garrett Hardin describes mental filters as having two characteristics: they allow some thoughts and ideas in and they keep some thoughts and ideas out, intentionally or unwittingly in either case. In the context of accelerating projects, the latter often present the greatest challenge—i.e., shutting out solutions that do not fit within our discipline comfort zone. The diarist, Anais Nin, captured the essence of this challenge when she said, “We see things not as they are, but as we are.”
Remarking on what he viewed as an unfruitful distinction between the arts and the sciences, Hardin said, “Academic people are inclined to forget that most bright people are neither physicists nor poets.” He goes on to add, “Our intellectual tools are filters for reducing reality to a manageable simplicity …. Most expertise is a single-filter expertise.” I couldn’t have said it better myself!
A true systems approach to accelerating projects requires going beyond the bounds of our expertise and the discipline we identify with. Furthermore, quantum leaps in accelerating projects are not likely if the system, of which the project is a part, is not considered in its entirety. As a minimum, this requires input from people who may otherwise be cut out of the ideation process—people who not only can champion the project, but can point out “hidden” opportunities for accelerating your project. But it also requires recognition of the somewhat obvious, but often overlooked fact that no matter how well crafted a project may be, if it is not embraced by and integrated into the system as a whole, the idea of setting an ambitious end-date for your project is in reality a moot point.
In summary, the Discipline Block has three strikes against it. Directly or indirectly it can serve as a barrier to 1) identifying schedule acceleration opportunities, 2) converting critical stakeholders who are part of the system, but not the project, into champions for your cause, and 3) bringing the project to closure. Awareness of the problem is a start in punching through this barrier. In subsequent blogs we will discuss how this barrier relates to the other barriers and, in true system fashion, how dealing with one is helpful in dealing with the others.
